>
Photobucket Photobucket Photobucket Photobucket Photobucket

Monday, January 10, 2011

When it comes to SEX, all bets are off

SMOKING
BINGING
ALCOHOLISM
RECKLESS DRIVING
COCAINE 
BULIMIA
OBESITY
TRANS-FATS
SUGAR
CARBS


As a society we speak up against ALL of these things and recognize them as unhealthy for an individual as well as society.  Obesity  is practically a federal crime, trans-fats outlawed, and carbs are otherwise known as the white devil!


But when it comes to SEX, ALL BETS ARE OFF!  We're handing out condoms to first graders!  In an age where relativism has taken over, we are so afraid of being judgmental that we have lost all common sense.  (Wondering if there is objective truth?  Go HERE.)  And so it's "anything goes".   We defend fornication, masturbation, contraception, divorce, sodomy and homosexuality.  The result?  Hearts are broken, families are destroyed, diseases are spread, and babies are murdered.  


Peter Kreeft writes,
The moral revolution is confined to sex. We are not allowed to steal another man's money without being put into jail, but we can steal another man's wife. You cannot betray your lawyer without being severely penalized, but you can betray your wife, and SHE is severely penalized. You cannot kill bald eagles or blue whales without being a criminal but you can kill your own children as long as you do it a second before the two blades of the scissors meet in the middle of the umbilical cord rather than a second after, or a second before the body emerges from the birth canal rather than a second after. What kind of logic is this? (Christian Anthropology verses the Sexual Revolution)
The reason we issue warnings about the initial list is because we care about the well-being of a person.  We don't judge a smoker as evil, we recognize that he is engaged in an unhealthy lifestyle and urge him to make choices that will better himself.  


The same is true for sex.  We do not judge a person engaged in fornication or homosexuality as evil.  We care about the person, and recognize the act as objectively disordered.  The actions do not define the essence of the person.  It is not their identity any more than my sins are my identity.  


Let's look at the consequences of male homosexual activity specifically.


But before we do- again I want to stress that I am focusing on the actions- not the person.  The Catechism states, "They must be accepted with respect, compassion, and sensitivity. Every sign of unjust discrimination in their regard should be avoided. These persons are called to fulfill God's will in their lives and, if they are Christians, to unite to the sacrifice of the Lord's Cross the difficulties they may encounter from their condition" (CCC 2358).


The G.ay & Lesbia.n Medi.cal Associat.ion warns gay men of ten common issues.  

  1. Increased risk for HIV/AIDS. (Also reported by the CDC here.)
  2. Substance abuse- commonly marijuana, Ecstasy, and amphetamines
  3. Higher rates of depression and anxiety- particularly adolescents and young adults
  4. Increased risk of hepatitis which can be potentially fatal.
  5. STDs occur in sexually active gay men at a high rate. 
  6. "Gay men may be at risk for death by prostate, testicular, or colon cancer."  
  7. Higher alcohol use in the gay community.
  8. Much higher rates of tobacco use (nearly fifty percent) 
  9. Fitness and obesity 
  10. Anal Papilloma- increased rates of anal cancers in gay men.  "The rate at which the infection can be spread between partners is very high."  

Can we objectively look at this list and say with love, that this is not a healthy lifestyle?  Extending recognition and benefits to same-sex unions encourages more same-sex unions.  More people might feel free to engage in this dangerous and destructive life-style.   


A similar list of negative consequences could be written for heterosexual activity outside of marriage.  Contraceptives in the pill form come with a list of warnings from the medical community.   When sex is not used as it is intended- for a man and a woman in marriage to be open to life and unity- there are dangerous consequences.  


This is because sex is holy, and holiness is powerful.  As I wrote about in my last Marriage Monday post, sex is holy because it allows us to participate in the Blessed Trinity and reflects our total, faithful and fruitful giving of our body to another as Christ gives His body for us.  
Sex images God because it makes new images of God...Sex is like religion not only because it is objectively holy in itself but also because it gives us subjectively a foretaste of heaven, of the self-forgetful, self-transcending self-giving that is what our deepest hearts are designed for, long for and will not be satisfied until they have, because we are made in God's own image and this self-giving constitutes the inner life of the Trinity (How to Win the Culture War, pg. 95).  
This subject is hard.  It is one that I have sat on for months now, feeling called to write about, but not knowing how.  In almost all sinful relationships, there is real genuine human love, and it seems hurtful to call the relationship sinful when there is love.  But loving a person means to do what is best for them.  Sometimes that means speaking up.  Sometimes that means pursuing a chaste relationship.  Sometimes that means writing a blog post that you're scared to publish!  


We do not stand in judgment of souls, but as compassionate friends reaching out a hand.  The Manhattan Declaration states, “We stand with them, even when they falter...We are also sinners who struggle and fall short of the good God has for our lives.  We are also in need of God’s patience, love and forgiveness."  


26 comments:

Kaitlin @ More Like Mary said...

Great post! Well said!

Lisa said...

Love you, brave friend!! Glad you finally posted this.

Sarah said...

I love this post! I think you articulate this so well. And I love the focus on compassion and love for the person. There are all sorts of ways we can make choices that are not healthy... love and compassion married to truth are the ways we grow and become healthier. I've never read a profound healing or conversion that came from shaming, angry, cold experiences with those who were "right".

Leila@LittleCatholicBubble said...

Bookmarked it! Facebooked it! It's a keeper!!

Cheryl Ruffing said...

Congratulations on your bravery. Your post is well written. A friend of mine works as an Ask-A-Nurse, and she often tells me about the phone calls she receives. If they aren't questions about sex, STDs and unplanned pregnancies, they are calls from single mothers with questions about their sick children. Those who proudly proclaim that sex should be enjoyed by just about anyone at anytime simply don't get it. One of the best homilies I've ever been privileged to hear was by Father Bill Carmody in Colorado Springs. He told us that God's yoke is easy; His burden is light. This is especially true of sex. If you follow God's plan and engage in sex only within marriage, you're not yoked to the burdens of out-of-wedlock births, contraceptive risks, STDs and abortions.

By the by, I found your blog when I joined Leila inside her bubble.

That Married Couple said...

Good post, and your point about society rejecting all those other things but not this is so true!

LifeHopes said...

Great post. thank you SO much for writing it. In fact, very relevant for me right now ... just spent the afternoon with one of my very best childhood friends who has been living with her boyfriend for over a decade and now has two children with him. The rest of the day my heart ached because I just don't know what to say. I hurt so bad for her. And she's Catholic. You said it so well.

Nicole C said...

Timely! Read Leila's latest post and the comment section. I outlined what PP is teaching about "sex ed" in our public schools in my state. Scary stuff.

Wonderful post!

Lisa said...

Many of the things on your list are only bad when taken to the extreme or when not used in moderation.

Ex: alcohol is not evil in itself, but the disease is can cause is.

Driving is not bad, but recklessly driving is.

Food/sugar/carbs are good for you, but when eaten too much or far too little, you can end up on one of the sides of the nutrition spectrum (obese or undernourished/anorexic/bulimic).

Likewise, sex, when in an appropriate context, is good for you, but can be dangerous when used out of the context it was intended. No one wants to say that sometimes, not everything goes for sex.

Lisa said...

I just posted this on Leila's latest post, but I thought it also fit perfectly here. It concerns a PP brochure about sex:

http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/archive/ldn/2010/nov/10111106

"Aimed at young people with HIV, the brochure contains sexually explicit language and promotes casual sex with multiple partners, as well as oral, anal, and homosexual sex.

'Some people like to have aggressive sex,' says the brochure. 'There is no right or wrong way to have sex.' It encourages young people who might have sex after drinking or using drugs to 'plan ahead by bringing condoms.'

Lisa said...

And one more thing before I get the kiddos dressed for the day... here's the text-only version of the actual PP pamphlet. It gets me all hot and bothered (and not in a good marital-sex kind of way, but in a pissed-off kind of way). :)

http://www.ippf.org/en/Resources/Guides-toolkits/Healthy+happy+and+hot+text.htm

Megan said...

Wonderful post, Lauren!!!! You are a woman of courage! Your post was very very well articulated, and you have spoken the truth with love and logic!!

Emily said...

Beautiful, compassionate, and real! I love when you do what you do best! :)

Emily said...

Beautiful, compassionate, and real! I love when you do what you do best! :)

WheelbarrowRider said...

I think you wrote about it perfectly! If only I could be as articulate-wow!

Anonymous said...

Lauren, overall you seem like such a nice person--I'm so sorry that you are under the spell of the Catholic church (tens of thousands of children molested by representatives of this same church! Few turned over to the police or defrocked! Why no posts about that?). I'm also sad that there are so many people who support this bigoted agenda, and there is nothing courageous about attempting to withhold basic civil rights from your fellow citizens.

Please examine your logic. You are saying that the "homosexual lifestyle" increases the risk of STDs. Why then, would you want to forbid these people from settling into monogamous relationships in marriage? Wouldn't that instantly reduce the incidence of these diseases and be a much better outcome?

You address only gay males--what about gay females? Studies have shown that exclusive lesbians have lower rates of STDs than heterosexual people do.

And finally, regarding rates of depression and anxiety, much of that comes from being told that their hard-wired biological impulses to create relationships with people of their own gender is sinful and shameful. If we as a society actually treated such people and their relationships with respect this would not be the case.

It is clear in this country that the momentum is not with your agenda. In twenty years there will be full gay rights and this time period will be looked back upon as shamefully as the pre-civil rights Jim Crow era, and everyone supporting this anti-rights agenda will be viewed with the same respect as members of the ku klux klan. In the great words of Marvin Gaye, "only love can conquer hate", and as more people understand that gay people are THE SAME as the rest of us and just want to live and love in peace it is guaranteed that this wonderful day is coming!

Lauren @ Magnify the Lord with Me said...

Thanks, everyone!

Good point, Cheryl! I'd like to have heard that homily!

Nicole- I nearly died when I read your comment on Leila's post about sex-ed. Add that to the ever-growing list of why we plan to home-school, God willing!

Lisa- exactly! (I don't really think carbs are the white devil!) That brochure is so misleading and sad, sad, sad. How dangerous!

Anonymous- can I get a name, please? I allow anonymous comments to make it easy for my Mom to post! :) Funny you mention marriage as a basic civil right. That is the very topic my next Marriage Monday will be focused on! "Is Marriage a RIGHT?" Stay tuned for that.

My concern in accepting homosexual marriage, is that we are accepting homosexuality as an alternative to heterosexuality. The data I shared regarding male homosexuality is startling and clearly unhealthy. Here is a link with warnings for lesbians:

http://lesbianlife.about.com/od/lesbianhealth/tp/HealthConcerns.htm

It is equally startling and unhealthy. Why would we encourage such a dangerous, unhealthy lifestyle?

In regards to the cause of depression- no doubt that one cause might be homophobia, but an extensive study in the Netherlands- where the Dutch are very "gay-friendly" and can marry legally- there is a high rate of psychiatric disease associated with homosexual practice. ("Same-sex Sexual Behavior and Psychiatric Disorders," Archives of General Psychiatry) Therefore we cannot simply reject depression as a result of social rejections.

And to your last points- YES! People are people are should all be loved and respected. And YES! Only love can conquer hate! Amen! Praying all of our hearts grow ever more in true and pure love with every passing day!

MB said...

Lauren! You have outdone yourself this time! This is absolutely fabulous! You are such a great teacher. Thank you for teaching me so much! You did such a fantastic job on this - I knew you would. Much love!

Frank said...

Lauren,

Well, Anonymous stole my thunder, but I agree with his/her post. I’ll add that you’re not using those lists of “health concerns” appropriately: not everything on those lists is associated with homosexuality—some are just things that all men (or all women on the lesbian lists) have to watch out for. For example, there’s nothing linking lesbians to osteoporosis except being female, and gay men are NOT more likely to get prostate, colon, or testicular cancer than other men. And I don’t believe that gay men are more likely to be obese than straight men—in fact, judging by the gay people I know, the opposite is more likely true.

So when you look at the “unhealthy lifestyles” of gays and lesbians, we’re talking about depression, substance abuse, and sexually transmitted diseases. Lauren, YOU KNOW that being in a stable, lifelong, committed union (aka a marriage) reduces the incidences of all of those things. That’s the point: marriage is good for society and it’s good for its participants, including gay people.

You say that you’re worried about accepting homosexuality as an alternative to heterosexuality. But you’re offering gay people a much less realistic (and, to my mind, much worse) alternative: lifelong celibacy. In reality, you’re condemning them to lifelong bachelorhood.

PS--I have to add, all this talk about the "unhealthiness" of the "gay lifestyle" is a bit distasteful to me. My gay friends are all exceptionally healthy, moral, wholesome folks. Though gay people on average may drink more, etc., it's clear to me that there's nothing inherently unhealthy about being gay.

PPS--Hi, Lisa!

Lauren @ Magnify the Lord with Me said...

WARNING: GRAPHIC DETAILS BELOW. You may not want to read this comment.

Frank~ Did you read the link where the 10 warnings came from? It's published by the Gay & Les.bian Medi.cal Associa.tion and THEY write, "Gay men may be at risk for death by prostate, testicular, or colon cancer." My opinion is that this is due to anal intercourse, as the anus is not designed for this purpose. It lacks the lubricants, networks of muscles to endure friction, and ability to resist immunological actions by semen and sperm. There is only one layer of cells providing protection from highly vascular tissue- a tear can easily lead to infection, especially ejaculation has components that are immunosuppressive. All of these factors may increase the risk of prostate or colon cancer. Again- it was the assertion of the G&L Med. Assoc.

Depression and substance abuse: Yes, statistically marriage makes people happier, healthier and richer, though I know many priests who are far more happy than many married couples. Did you note the Netherlands study that I referenced above in my comment? It points out that compared to males without homosexual contact in the last 12 months, males who had homosexual contact in the last twelve months much more likely to experience major depression, bipolar disorder, panic disorder, agoraphobia and obsessive compulsive disorder. (Similar results for females.)

You consider life-long celibacy a fate worse than death, but as a Catholic, I believe we are ALL called to chastity, and statistics, medical and social science support this. The happiest, healthiest people are those who live chaste lives- either celibate for a purpose or one of monogamy with their spouse.

You end with, "it's clear to me that there's nothing inherently unhealthy about being gay." I agree!!! It is not having homosexual tendencies, but the acting on those tendencies.

I consider this very, very difficult, too, Frank. That is why I sat on this post for MONTHS working it over in my head and heart. I go back to the beginning of my post. Why can we judge certain behaviors as unhealthy, but when it comes to sex, all bets are off? As Lisa quoted above- the teaching is, "There is no right or wrong way to have sex." and so we now hand out condoms to first graders. Why do we expect self-control when it comes to drinking, eating, and exercise, but NO WAY could people be expected to control themselves when it comes to sex?

Frank said...

PS--Why do you put periods in "Gay & Les.bian Medi.cal Associa.tion"? I've seen it on other blogs, too.

Frank said...

(I tried to post this a few minutes ago, but I don't know if it went through. I hope it's not a repeat.)

All men are at risk of dying of prostate, testicular, or colon cancer. The site you’re linking doesn’t say anywhere that gay men have a higher risk than straight men. Read it again. And I’ve never heard of any study that links homosexuality to any of those cancers. I did a quick search, and couldn’t find any study that did so.

I did note your Netherlands study. I don’t think being gay is easy anywhere, but this study suggests that it’s much harder in states that enact the types of gay marriage bans you support:

(http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-sexual-continuum/201003/new-study-suggests-bans-gay-marriage-hurt-mental-health-lgb-people)

Two larger points:

1) You’re confusing self-control with celibacy. You’ll never hear me arguing against sexual self-control.

2) Many of my gay friends are in relationships and, I want to re-emphasize, they are healthy in every sense of the word.

Anyway, I'm glad you're thinking about this, and I'm glad you're open to conversation.

Lauren @ Magnify the Lord with Me said...

Frank- a very quick answer to your second question- will address your main comment later. I insert periods in certain names to prevent a google search of the name from bringing up my blog. For example, I don't want someone to search "Tar.get" and google to bring up "Magnify the Lord with me". That's all!

More later...glad you came back!

Frank said...

Ah! Smart.

Lauren @ Magnify the Lord with Me said...

Strange- I was going through my inbox and realized I never responded to Frank's last comment. Then I realized IT'S NOT HERE! How bizarre! What happened to your comment, Frank?! I'll copy and paste it here, and reply separately.


Frank
Thursday, January 13, 10:06 PM

All men are at risk of dying of prostate, testicular, or colon cancer. The site you’re linking doesn’t say anywhere that gay men have a higher risk than straight men. Read it again. And I’ve never heard of any study that links homosexuality to those cancers. I did a quick search, and couldn’t find any study that did so.

I did note your Netherlands study. I don’t think being gay is easy anywhere, but this study suggests that it’s much harder in states that enact the types of gay marriage bans you support:

(http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-sexual-continuum/201003/new-study-suggests-bans-gay-marriage-hurt-mental-health-lgb-people)

Two larger points:

1) You’re confusing self-control with celibacy. You’ll never hear me arguing against sexual self-control.

2) Many of my gay friends are in relationships and, I want to re-emphasize, they are healthy in every sense of the word.

Anyway, I'm glad you're thinking about this, and I'm glad you're open to conversation.

Lauren @ Magnify the Lord with Me said...

I did read it again, and while it does not specifically say it's a higher risk for gay men, it does list it as a warning. The American Cancer Society has this pamphlet with the following introduction:

"Gay and bisexual men have many of the same cancer risks as other men. But they may also face some additional challenges, such as increased risks for certain types of cancer and barriers to getting the health care they need. Learn more in this brief guide."
http://www.cancer.org/Healthy/FindCancerEarly/MensHealth/index

But that is neither here nor there. Even if gay men are not at a higher risk of cancer than monogamous, straight men, the point is still valid.

The only SAFE sex is sex between one man and one woman within marriage. Why do we expect self control for all areas of life except for sex?

RE: the Netherlands study- gay marriage is legal and socially accepted there! Its findings bear repeating, It points out that compared to males without homosexual contact in the last 12 months, males who had homosexual contact in the last twelve months much more likely to experience major depression, bipolar disorder, panic disorder, agoraphobia and obsessive compulsive disorder. (Similar results for females.)

As I wrote to you privately, I am so glad that your friends are so healthy! But I know healthy smokers, too! I'm looking at the MACRO level, not the micro. Of course there will be exceptions, but as a whole, the warnings are valid. If they weren't, I'm sure G.ay & Lesbia.n Medi.cal Associat.ion would NEVER have printed the top ten warning list! Bad press!